Results - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 1
About This Presentation
Title:

Results

Description:

Auxiliary 'was' is an appropriate intervention target because it is never absent ... s, auxiliary/copula 'BE' forms, possessive s, and plural s are optional in AAE. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 2
Provided by: convent9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Results


1
Morphological Intervention with African American
English Speaking Children Auxiliary BE Frances
Burns, Texas State University-San Marcos Stephen
M. Camarata, Vanderbilt University This research
was supported in part by NIH grant DC005994
  • Results
  • Participants 1-3 moved from zero overt tense
    marking to consistent use of auxiliary was and
    increased use of auxiliary is at the post
    phase.
  • Targeting auxiliary are appeared to influence
    P1s and P3s use of the form.
  • Conclusions
  • Auxiliary was is an appropriate intervention
    target because it is never absent in
    typically-developing (TD) AAE speaking children.
  • Auxiliary is/are are optional in AAE and
    should not be targeted until the linguistic
    constraints governing their optionality have been
    determined.
  • Discussion
  • Morphological treatment should be sensitive to a
    childs dialect and expected outcomes should
    mirror production rates of TD AAE speakers.
  • Past tense ed, 3rd person s, auxiliary/copula
    BE forms, possessive s, and plural s are
    optional in AAE. This optionality complicates the
    decision of whether to provide intervention to
    children suspected of having underlying
    grammatical deficits. This study is a foundation
    for identifying parameters for including young
    AAE speakers in morphological treatment.
  • Reference Leonard, L.B., Camarata, S.M.,
    Pawlowska, M., Brown, B., Camarata, M.N. (2006.
    Tense and agreement morphemes in speech of
    children with specific language impairment during
    intervention Phase 2. Journal of Speech,
    Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 749-770.
  • Purpose
  • To examine whether children who speak African
    American English (AAE) and have been diagnosed
    with specific language impairment (SLI), benefit
    from intervention using grammatical morphemes
    that mark tense and agreement.
  • To identify appropriate morphological
    intervention targets for young AAE speakers with
    SLI.
  • Research Question
  • Do young AAE speakers with SLI benefit from
    intervention using grammatical morphemes that
    mark tense and agreement (auxiliary is/are/was)?
  • Method
  • 4 African American males ages 36-49 with SLI
    were disaggregated from a larger NIH grant (5R01
    DC005994-2 (Leonard)
  • The absence of auxiliary/copula was was used as
    one of the indicators of morpho-syntactic
    impairment.
  • Participants received morphological intervention
    using grammatical morphemes that mark tense and
    agreement (auxiliary is/are/was).
  • Probe tasks were used to assess the participants
    use of auxiliary is/are/was at pre, mid, post
    and follow-up phases.
  • Results
  • All participants showed gains in the production
    of auxiliary is/was. However gains were much
    lower for participant 4 (P4), who demonstrated
    more impaired language skills.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com