Title: Effects of urban land-use change on soil carbon pools and fluxes
1Effects of urban land-use change on soil carbon
pools and fluxes
R. Pouyat, I. Yesilonis, P. Groffman, J.
Russell-Anelli
Funding USDA FS Global Change Program, Center
for Urban Environmental Research and Education
(CUERE), Baltimore Ecosystem Study (BES)
2LAND USE CHANGE EFFECTS ON SOIL ORGANIC CARBON
?
3URBAN SOIL MOSAIC
SMALL PARCELS DIVERSE LAND OWNERS INTENSIVE
MANAGEMENT HIGHLY DISTURBED COVERED
SOILS URBAN CLIMATE CHANGE/POLLUTANTS REMNANT
PATCHES
4DISTURBED AND MADE SOILS
5SOIL DISTURBANCE EFFECTS?
1. SOIL PHYSICAL DISTURBANCES MIXING AND
COMPACTION DISRUPTION OF SOIL AGGREGATES
DRAINAGE 2. BURIAL AND COVERAGE OF SOIL
LAND FILL IMPERVIOUS SURFACES REDUCED
AERATION 3. LOSS OF SURFACE HORIZONS (EROSION)
6BALTIMORE COUNTY
?
2600 m2
TOP SOIL?
DISTURBED SOIL
SUB SOIL
2.7 x 104 kg SOC
McGuire (2004)
7MADE SOIL ORGANIC C PEDON DATA
C DENSITY (kg m-2)
MADE SOIL TYPE
n
REFUSE 2 17.2 (3.3) CLEAN FILL 8 2.8
(1.0) DREDGE (RECENT) 1 24.7 DREDGE (OLD) 4
3.8 (0.3)
n of pits L. Hernandez, NRCS, NYC Soil
Survey (NEW YORK CITY) D. Fanning, J.R. Short
(WASHINGTON DC AND BALTIMORE)
8BALTIMORE CITY
2.00
1.80
r 0.52 P lt 0.0001
1.60
1.40
1.20
Bulk Density (Mg m-3)
1.00
0.80
0.60
0-5 cm
0.40
n 126
0.20
10 land-use types
0.00
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
SOM ()
Pouyat et al. 2001
9MANAGEMENT/SITE HISTORY?
Supplements
Clipping
Erosion
Cultivation
10MARYLAND, USA TURFGRASS MAINTENANCE COSTS
(MANAGEMENT EFFORT VARIES!)
COST PER ACRE (IN U.S. DOLLARS)
LAND-USE TYPE
GOLF COURSES 2,727 LAWN CARE
FIRMS 1,969 ATHLETIC FIELDS 1,155 PARKS
450 DETACHED HOMES 369 CHURCHES 166
11Lawn Carbon Densities
n 2
Recreational use/grass
n 4
Residential grass
n 6
Park use/grass
0
10
20
30
2
Carbon Density (Kg/m
)
L. Hernandez, NRCS, NYC Soil Survey (NEW YORK
CITY) H.K. Jo and E.G. McPhereson (CHICAGO) C.Y.
Jim (HONG KONG) Stroganova et al. (MOSCOW)
12- Management/Cover
- Site history
From Qian and Follet (2002)
13AGE SINCE DEVELOPMENT
12
10
8
Woody Vegetation C
Carbon (kg m-2)
Lawn Stubble C
6
SOC 0-10 cm
4
SOC 10-20 cm
SOC 20-30 cm
2
Veg n53 sites total (not all represented
here) Soil n 14 sites total
0
Grass- land
1990s
AGRIC.
1950s
1960s
1970s
1980s
Land Use or Decade of Development
Golubiewski and Wessman, 2004, submitted
Golubiewski and Wessman (2004, submitted)
14BALTIMORE COUNTY
10.0
10.0
P 0.09
1970 (n11, lawns)
1980 (n13, lawns)
7.5
7.5
0-5 cm
SOM g/100g
5.0
5.0
2.5
2.5
0.0
0.0
OM
pH
Yesilonis, Pouyat, Russell-Anelli
15URBAN ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE
- 1. Altered temperature regimes
- 2. Introduction of pollutants
- - Toxic and sub lethal effects
- - Fertilization (CO2, N deposition)
- 3. Introduction of non-natives
- - Litter quality
- - Keystone species (earthworms)
- 4. Altered hydrologic processes
16RESPONSE ALONG URBAN-RURAL GRADIENT IN NEW YORK
CITY
URBAN RURAL
URBAN RURAL
Soil Pb, Cu, Ni Soil Ca, Mg,Total salts Soil
Temperature N, S, Ca, Mg deposition Exotic
Earthworms/Mull
Fungi Microinverts Mor soils Litter quality
Pouyat et al 1995
17SOIL C POOLS (0-15 cm) Pool Urban
Rural mg g-1 Readily
Mineralizable 2.1 (0.5) 7.4 (3.3) Labile
(microbial) 6.9 (1.3) 20.9 (2.6) Potentially
Mineralizable 4.7 (0.5) 6.8 (0.5) Passive
(total) 97 (3.3) 73 (4.3)
Groffman et al. (1995)
18SOIL ORGANIC C ?
19?
Remnant soils?
p
Data in Pouyat et al. 2003
20Net Change SOC in Hypothetical 1000 ha Urban
Landscape
Pre-Agriculture Pre-Urban (Ag) Urban
kg C
4.17 x 10-6 2.59 x 10-6 2.36 (?) x 10-6
6.31 x 10-6 6.26 x 10-6 5.06 x 10-6
Mid-Atlantic Southeast Southwest
11.56 x 10-6 7.74 x 10-6 1.4 x 10-6
soil organic carbon density to 1 m depth (kg C
m-2) data for forest and crop SOC from Birdsey
(1992)
Land-use and impervious cover data for 58 cities
USA (Nowak et al., 1996)
211 m DEPTH SOIL CORES
22BALTIMORE CITY
n plots (3 cores/plot)
N
n
Pouyat, Yesilonis and Russell-Anelli
23BURIED A HORIZONS?
24Ecotope Mapping
Historic Air Photos
Stratify Samples
Change Analysis
E. Ellis
25CONCLUSIONS
- SOC pools vary widely in urban mosaic
- 2. Management use affect SOC pools
- SOC pools disturbances ?, management ?
- Net effects depend on prevailing climate
- 3. Urban environmental effects less important
(pools/quality?), potentially more widespread - 4. Permanence of urban land-use conversions has
long-term implications (net gain or loss). - 5. Uncertainties (spatial variation, C density
measurements, covered soils, site history)
26(No Transcript)