Representation of Europe - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Representation of Europe

Description:

Different aspects and debates in studying national identity ... Attachement to EU: between (parochial) ingroups and outgroups. Dimensions for differences: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:74
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: kissp
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Representation of Europe


1
Representation of Europe
  • Commonalities and national differences

Paszkál Kiss EuroPhD on S.R. C. Roma, 2005
2
Main points
  • National identity its complexity, and its
    functions
  • Different aspects and debates in studying
    national identity
  • Commonalities and differences the representations
    of the nation and of the EU

3
National identity components and functions
  • National identity is multidimensional
  • Different functions of national identity
  • Levels and aspects in social identification

4
National identity is a multidimensional construct
(Smith)
  • Historic territory, homeland
  • Shared myths and common historic memories
  • Shared popular culture
  • Same rights and duties
  • Single economic territory with mobility of labour
    and exchange of goods

5
Some functions of national identity
  • Locates the community in space and time
  • Supports state power and institutions
  • Reinforces economic control over a given
    territory
  • Provides framework for socialization of people as
    citizens
  • Establishes a social bond between individuals (by
    providing shared values and symbols)
  • Provides a social framework for individual
    identification

6
Cumulative hierarchies of regional, national, EU,
and international attitudes (Dekker)
7
Different aspects and debates in studying
national identity
  • Different disciplines about NI
  • Debates about when is the nation
  • Psychological theories

8
Different disciplines about national identity
  • History (emergence of nations)
  • Philosophy (nation as an end/value)
  • Anthropology (cultural analysis and comparison)
  • Political Science (national institutions,
    governance, international order)
  • Sociology (societal structure of nations)
  • Psychology (national identification, national
    stereotypes, prejudice)

9
When is the nation?
Primordialists
Ethnosymbolists
Modernists
Nations are eternal Nations are natural
collective phenomena Psychologism social need
(group selection)
Ethnic roots of nations Elite redraws previously
existing ethnic heritage Cultural and political
bases for nations (role of symbols and
remembering)
Nations are only in modernity Elite
construction State has primary role (idea of
nation-state)
10
Classic and modern psychological theories about
nations
  • Nations from inside
  • group dynamics (centripetal and centrifugal
    forces)
  • leader and public (mass psychology)
  • indigenous culture studied by cultural psychology
  • social representations
  • Nations in comparison
  • study of national character
  • national stereotypes
  • intercultural comparison
  • social identity theory
  • realistic conflict theory

11
Empirical research
  • Euronat poject
  • Survey on public opinion

12
Euronat project 2001-2004
  • Research on elite (media, political discourse)
    and everyday (questionnaire, interview)
    representations about nation and Europe
  • Multiple methods used historic analysis, media
    analysis, analysis of political discourse,
    survey, interview
  • Countries involved Austria, Czech Republic,
    Great Britain, Greece, Germany, Hungary, Italy,
    Poland, Spain
  • Founded by European Commission Research DG, Key
    Action Improving the Socio-Economic Knowledge
    Base (contract no. HPSE-CT2001-00044)

13
Survey on public opinon
  • Spring, 2002
  • Representative samples from 9 countries
    (N10,023)
  • Three questions
  • 1. Social distance 2. representation of the
    nation3. representation of Europe

14
Closeness as a general attitude
  • The question
  • Correlations
  • National identification patterns

15
what extent you feel close to the following
groups?
  • people in city, village
  • people in region
  • fellow nationals
  • EU citizens
  • fellow Europeans
  • people in CEU
  • Arabs
  • Turks
  • Russians
  • US citizens
  • Gypsies
  • Jews

16
Optimal Scaling social distance
17
National-European identification
18
Cognitive aspects of representing the nation
  • The question
  • Results

19
I feel Hungarian because I share with my
fellow Hungarians
  • a national economy
  • national defence system
  • our homeland
  • a feeling of national pride
  • national independence and sovereignty
  • our national character
  • our national symbols (e.g. the flag, the national
    anthem)
  • common culture, customs and traditions
  • common language
  • common ancestry
  • common history, destiny
  • common political and legal system
  • common rights and duties
  • common system of social protection

20
Optimal Scaling rep. of nation
21
Cognitive aspects of EU-representation
  • The question
  • Results

22
I feel European because I share with fellow
Europeans
  • common civilisation
  • Membership in a European society with many
    languages and cultures
  • common ancestry
  • common history, destiny
  • EU institutions and an emerging common political
    and legal system
  • common rights and duties
  • common system of social protection within the EU
  • free movement and residence in any part of the EU
    territory
  • emerging EU defense system
  • common European homeland
  • feeling of pride for being European
  • Sovereignty within the EU territory
  • a (future) common EU currency
  • set of EU symbols (e.g. flag, anthem)

23
Optimal Scaling rep. of EU
24
Conclusions
  • Commonalities
  • Differences

25
Conclusions I.
  • Attachement to EU between (parochial) ingroups
    and outgroups
  • Dimensions for differences ethnic (emotional,
    cultural) civic (legal, instrumental)levels of
    identification (region, nation, EU)
  • National identity is not in conflict with
    European attachments (not only independence but
    also synergy)

26
Conclusions II.
  • In both the attitudinal and representational
    aspects there are great national differences
  • In attitudes there is a difference in
    distinguishing between ingroups and outgrups
  • There is a difference in inclusive-exclusiveness
    of national identification (to EU-attachment)
  • In rep. of nation there is a difference in
    emphasizing cultural or non-cultural elements
  • In rep. of EU there is a difference in
    emphasizing cultural or non-cultural elements
  • Differences depend on national history and culture

27
Thank you for your attention!
  • paszkal_kiss_at_ludens.elte.hu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com