Galaxy modelling in the era of massive surveys of the Milky Way - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Galaxy modelling in the era of massive surveys of the Milky Way

Description:

Parallax. Proper motion catalogues. USNO B1 catalog (1 billion stars 0.2as and pm) ... First mag-limited parallax survey. Complete to V = 20. Radial v 1 to 10 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: jamesb8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Galaxy modelling in the era of massive surveys of the Milky Way


1
Galaxy modelling in the era of massive surveys
of the Milky Way
  • James Binney
  • Oxford University

2
Outline
  • Surveys of the Galaxy
  • Power of dynamical models
  • Gross structure fine structure
  • Hierarchical modelling
  • How to tune the potential

3
Surveys
  • Proper motion
  • Radial velocity
  • Microlensing
  • Parallax

4
Proper motion catalogues
  • USNO B1 catalog (1 billion stars 0.2as and pm)
  • Tycho 2
    (2.5 million stars to m11.5 lt0.1as and
    lt3mas/yr)
  • 2MASS (0.3 billion stars 0.1as)
  • USNO UCAC
    (70 million stars to R16.5, lt0.07as and lt5
    mas/yr)
  • Pan-STARRS
    (4x1.8m f.l.2006 all sky m24 10mas)

5
Microlensing surveys
  • MACHO
  • EROS
  • OGLE III (monitors 2x108 stars in bulge, 3x107
    stars in clouds, 400 events/yr)

6
Radial velocity surveys
  • Geneva (20000 stars, complete part Hipparcos)
  • 2dF
  • SDSS (0.1as, currently spectra 18000 stars)
  • RAVE (5x107 stars all sky to V16 by 2010 105
    stars by 2005 vr, Z)
  • GAIA (2012 --)

7
Parallax surveys GAIA
  • In 2011 ESA to launch GAIA mission
  • First mag-limited parallax survey
  • Complete to V 20
  • Radial v 1 to 10 km/s to V 17
  • 4 broad 11 medium photometric bands
  • ?µ lt 5µas/yr
  • ?p lt 10 µas (Vlt15)
  • 1 billion stars in catalogue

8
Characteristics of data sets
  • Different coordinates have radically different
    errors (a,d,µa,µd,vr,s)
  • Some coordinates poorly or unconstrained
  • Parts of phase space inaccessible (obscuration,
    magnitude limit)
  • Probabilistic approach essential

9
What we want to know
  • For each component a (range of related stellar
    types) seek DF fa(x,v)
  • Brute force divide 6d phase space into bins
    count stars in bins
  • Impracticable because
  • Poisson fluctuations acceptable for Nigt10 so must
    have lt N/10 bins
  • 6d cube with N/10 bins has (N/10)1/6 on a side
  • For N107, gives 10 bins on a side, e.g. ?v60
    km/s
  • Anyway this approach cannot handle errors/missing
    coordinates

10
Reduce dimensionality
  • Solar-system analogy
  • Distribution of asteroids in (e,a) reveals
    Kirkwood gaps
  • Distribution in angles usually uninteresting (but
    Greeks Trojans!)
  • Reveal structure by projecting out action- angle
    variables
  • Application of Jeans theorem leads to prediction
    of f(x,v) at observationally inaccessible points

11
Problem
  • For Solar system we know Hamiltonian
  • Not so for MW (dark matter)
  • Determination of H important sub-problem

12
Perturbation Theory
  • In solar system use H HKeplerHJupiter
  • In MW use H HaxisymmHbarHspiral
  • How to choose Haxisymm?

13
Torus Programme(McGill Binney 1990
Kaasalainen Binney 1994)
14
Structure from non-integrable H
P-theory
15
In real space
Perturbation theory
Direct integration
16
For powerful resonances
Chaotic region bounded by constructed tori
17
Build hierarchy of models
  • Start with integrable axisymmetric model
  • Add selected resonances by p-theory or sub-torus
    construction
  • Add perturbation by bar
  • Add perturbation by regular spirals
  • Find acceptable model of minimal complexity
  • Understand physical significance of features in
    data

18
Diagnostic Structure
  • How to assess correctness of F?
  • dH resonant trapping gaps
  • Expect features in DF along n.O 0
  • Errors in F features not coincident
  • with n.O 0

19
Levitation(Sridhar Touma 1996)
  • E.g. ?-? 0 likely important
  • ? gt ? before disk forms
  • Eventually ? ? on Jz 0
  • Very high DF on Jz 0
  • Carried to Jz gt 0 as disk grows
  • Location of resonance sensitive to disk mass /
    halo flattening

20
Tidal Streams
  • Tidal steams clusters in J-space around
    orbit of parent satellite
  • In preliminary F find loose cluster
  • Tweak F to tighten cluster
  • (cf adaptive optics)

Pal 5 Odenkirchen et al 01
21
Conclusions
  • Even with billion stars kinematic modelling
    hopeless
  • With action-angle variables can project out
    irrelevant variables
  • Discover structure due to resonances and infall
    history
  • Differs from solar-system work because H to be
    determined
  • Resonant families tidal streams enable us to
    tune H
  • Important to control introduction of
    substructure
  • torus programme permits
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com