The Rationale for Initiating Therapy with FixedDose Combinations in Hypertension - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

The Rationale for Initiating Therapy with FixedDose Combinations in Hypertension

Description:

New Orleans, LA. Disclosure: Grant support: Astra Zeneca, Amgen, Abbott, Novartis, The National Institutes of ... Consultant for Novartis, Pfizer, Boehringer ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:675
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: thomas97
Learn more at: http://www.fda.gov
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Rationale for Initiating Therapy with FixedDose Combinations in Hypertension


1
The Rationale for Initiating Therapy with
Fixed-Dose Combinations in Hypertension
  • Thomas D. Giles, M.D.
  • Tulane University School of Medicine
  • New Orleans, LA

2
Disclosure Grant support Astra Zeneca,
Amgen, Abbott, Novartis, The National Institutes
of Health, Boehringer-Ingelheim, and
Sankyo/Forest. Consultant for Novartis, Pfizer,
Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and
Sankyo/Forest.This presentation is supported by
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
3
Historical Lessons on the Risks of Hypertension
and the Benefits of Treatment
Hypertension IncreasesMorbidity and Mortality
Treatment DecreasesMorbidity and Mortality
CHD Incidence Rate/1000 Person Years
Cumulative Fatal Nonfatal Endpoints
The Framingham Study
The Vet. Adm. Study II
Ann Intern Med. 1961 553350.
JAMA. 1970 21311431152.
4
Combination Therapy for Hypertension Is Not New
  • VA Cooperative Study
  • HCTZ 50 mg bid
  • reserpine 0.1 mg bid
  • hydralazine 25 mg tid
  • HCTZ, hydralazine and reserpine were combined in
    a single tablet
  • Ser-Ap-Es, Ser-A-Gen, Seralazide, Serpazide

HCTZ, hydrochlorothiazide.Materson BJ et al.
Hypertension. 199015348-360.
5
Current Antihypertensive Therapy Reduces CV Events
Major CV Events
Stroke
CV Death
0
20
2030
40
3040
3040
Average Reduction in Events,
60
80
100
CVcardiovascular. Neal B et al. Lancet.
200035619551964.
6
CV Mortality Risk Doubles WithEach 20/10 mm Hg
BP Increment
8
7
6
5
CVmortalityrisk
4
3
2
1
0
115/75
135/85
155/95
175/105
SBP/DBP (mm Hg)
Individuals aged 40-69 years, starting at BP
115/75 mm Hg. CV, cardiovascular DBP, diastolic
blood pressure SBP, systolic blood
pressure. Lewington S et al. Lancet.
20023601903-1913. Chobanian AV et al. JAMA.
20032892560-2572.
7
BP Differences of 10 mmHg Are Associated With Up
to a 40 Effect on CV Risk
  • Meta-analysis of 61 prospective, observational
    studies
  • 1 million adults
  • 12.7 million person-years


30 reduction in risk of IHD mortality
10 mmHg decrease in mean SBP
40 reduction in risk of stroke mortality
Lewington S et al. Lancet. 200236019031913.
8
Importance of Lowering BP (Data from Multiple
Clinical Trials Measuring the Impact of
Hypertensive Therapy on Cardiovascular Mortality)
Cardiovascular Mortality
actively controlled trials. placebo-controlled
studies or trials with an untreated control
group. Negative values indicate tighter BP
control on reference treatment.
1.50
MIDAS/NICS/VHAS
UKPDS C vs A
P0.002
1.25
NORDIL
INSIGHT
HOT L vs H
STOP2/ACEIs
HOT M vs H
MRC1
1.00
MRC2
STOP2/CCBs
Odds Ratio (experimental/reference)
SHEP
HEP
0.75
STONE
EWPHE
Syst-Eur
CAPPP
HOPE
UKPDS L vs H
RCT70-80
Syst-China
0.50
PART2/SCAT
STOP1
ATMH
0.25
5
0
5
10
15
20
25
Difference (reference treatment minus
experimental treatment) in Systolic BP (mmHg)
Greater differences in BP reduction mean greater
reductions in the risk of cardiovascular
mortality. BP, blood pressure Staessen JA et al.
Hypertension Research. 200528385-407.
9
Multiple Antihypertensive Agents Are Needed to
Achieve Target BP
Number of antihypertensive agents
Target BP (mm Hg)
Trial
1
2
3
4
DBP, diastolic blood pressure MAP, mean arterial
pressure SBP, systolic blood pressure. Bakris
GL et al. Am J Kidney Dis. 200036646-661. Lewis
EJ et al. N Engl J Med. 2001345851-860. Cushman
WC et al. J Clin Hypertens. 20024393-405.
10
JNC 7 Treatment Guidelines recommend considering
initiating therapy with two drugs when BP
gt20/10mmHg above goal
  • JNC7 recommends BP be reduced to lt 140/90mmHg
  • For patients with diabetes or CKD lt 130/80mmHg
  • Consider initiating therapy with two drugs in
    patients whose BP is gt20/10mmHg above goal (Stage
    2 and Stage 1 patients at high risk)
  • thereby increasing the likelihood of achieving
    goal BP in a timely manner.Multi-drug
    combinations often produce greater BP reduction
    at lower doses of the component agents resulting
    in fewer side effects. The use of fixed dose
    combinations may be more convenient and simplify
    the treatment regimen.
  • More than 2/3 of patients will require two or
    more agents

Chobanian et al., JAMA 2003 289256072,
11
Initial Fixed-Dose Combination Therapy
  • ADVANTAGES (1)
  • 2 drugs needed for control of Stage 2 BP
  • Low (therapeutic) dose of 2 drugs
  • more effective than higher dose of single drug
  • usually well tolerated
  • adverse effects can be reduced
  • Simplified treatment regimen better adherence
    and potential for improved outcomes
  • Economic benefits
  • Fewer copayments
  • health care costs reduced
  • fewer office visits

12
Initial Fixed-Dose Combination Therapy
  • ADVANTAGES (2)
  • Many combinations of agents with complementary
    MOA available, e.g.
  • RAS blocker/diuretic
  • RAS blocker/CCB
  • Patient response to fixed dose combinations
    predictable
  • FDCs well studied and efficacy and tolerability
    data available in package inserts and
    publications
  • Similar data not always available for ad hoc
    free combinations

13
Initial Fixed-Dose Combination Therapy
  • DISADVANTAGES
  • BP may be controlled with 1 drug in some patients
  • However, majority of patients require 2 drugs
  • Combination too potent causing hypotension
  • Benefit risk profile for each combination should
    be assessed in appropriate patient population
  • Individualize therapy
  • Additive risk for dose independent adverse
    effects
  • However, mono components likely to be taken as
    part of a multi drug regimen
  • Balance against risk of dose dependent side
    effects with high dose monotherapy and risk of
    inadequate BP control (stroke, heart failure and
    MI)
  • If adverse effects
  • must discontinue both drugs
  • However components have well characterized safety
    profiles so causal components usually identified
    easily
  • more office visits
  • more lab tests

14
Conclusions (1)
  • Controlling hypertension reduces CV outcomes
  • Doubling of CV risk with BP increases of
    20/10mmHg
  • Relationship between BP and CV risk is
    continuous lower is better
  • Majority of patients require gt2 drugs to achieve
    BP goal
  • JNC 7 recommends initial combination therapy in
    patients gt 20/10 mm Hg over goal BP

15
Conclusions (2)
  • Multiple combinations have been well studied in
    patients with Stage 2 hypertension
  • Patient response to fixed dose combinations is
    predictable
  • Incremental efficacy with good tolerability
    achieved with combinations representative of
    several antihypertensive classes, not just
    thiazide combinations as referenced in JNC7
  • Benefit/risk profile of these agents can be
    determined from clinical studies to support
    appropriate clinical use
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com