The changing nature of Higher Education: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

The changing nature of Higher Education:

Description:

Oriel College, Oxford. 1826 - 1842. The Idea of a University. The University is a temple for the teaching of universal knowledge. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:55
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: heacad
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The changing nature of Higher Education:


1
The changing nature of Higher Education
  • as academics is it our responsibility to ensure
    that our students are employable, or are we
    'simply' educators?

Dr. Peter Barnes Department of Sport, Culture
and the Arts
2
John Henry Newman, Oriel College, Oxford. 1826 -
1842
  • The Idea of a University
  • The University is a temple for the teaching of
    universal knowledge. (specialist knowledge should
    be taught in an institution)
  • The only goal of a university should be the
    cultivation of the intellect
  • A university produces gentlemen trained in logic
    and the methods of assessing evidence (the
    classics)
  • Is run by tutors who regard their office as a
    calling

3
John Anderson Professor of Natural Philosophy,
Glasgow University
  • Gave instructions for a place of useful learning,
    open to everyone, regardless of gender or class.
  • Anderson's Institution - 1796
  • University of Strathclyde - 1964

4
Is it true that
  • A competency driven model is at odds with an
    academically based model?
  • Academic integrity takes second place to
    professional body requirements?

5
Is it true that
  • A competency based model is results driven i.e.
    quantity of learning (outcome)
  • An academic based model is philosophically driven
    i.e. quality of learning (process)

6
Should our priorities be
  • employability?
  • What employers want (/need)?
  • competency?
  • or - academic standards?
  • or - what the subject dictates?
  • or - intellectual ability?

7
The employers model for Higher Education
Academic Theory Process
Practical Outdoor Experience
Technical Skills NGB Awards
8
The employers model
  • Or - the university validation model -
  • Good level of technical skills and NGB
    qualifications
  • Reasonable level of practical experience
  • Theory and process is a necessity
  • hit the shop floor running
  • But issues with costs, staffing credibility

9
The students model for Higher Education
Academic Theory Process
10
The students model
  • Or - the university marketing model -
  • Plenty of Experience
  • Good level of Technical Skills and Awards
  • Minimal amount of Theory and Process
  • have fun and get a job
  • But academically unrealistic and has
    problems with student expectations

11
The academics model for Higher Education
12
The academics model
  • Or - the university finance driven model -
  • Maximum Theory and Process
  • Externally delivered Technical Skills and Awards
  • Experience primarily in students own time
  • meeting the requirments of academic credibility
  • But student motivation and employers
    expectations suffer

13
Do we need
  • A greater understanding of
  • What distinguishes a degree from a vocational
    qualification?
  • What distinguishes a university from a training
    establishment?
  • What distinguishes a graduate from an apprentice?
  • What distinguishes a lecturer from a trainer?

14
Outdoor Education Organisations - surveyed
2003
  • 300 Outdoor Education centres/organisations
    surveyed via mail-shot questionnaire
  • 48 return rate
  • 60 closed questions 6 open questions
  • Designed to ascertain what potential employers
    would expect/need from an outdoor education
    degree

15
Most important requirements - results by
groups
  • Outdoor activity awards/ skills
  • Personal attributes
  • Experience
  • Group working skills
  • Communication skills
  • Knowledge understanding
  • Problem solving skills
  • Project/ management skills
  • Information technology skills
  • Academic awards/ skills

16
The importance of Higher Education other
skills/awards
17
So where are we today?
  • Increasing under-graduate numbers
  • Increasing number of universities
  • Increasing need to demonstrate relevance and
    employability
  • Increasing demand for externally assessed/
    verified qualifications
  • Increasing financial staffing pressures
  • But do we serve a changing market place?
  • Is it time to ditch the old models (and ideals)?

18
A Modern Model for Higher Education?
Transferable Skills
SPDP
Education or equivalent training
Professional Body or equivalent training/
awards (External/Placement)
Technical
Process
Competence check lists
Real World Experience (Experience/Placement)
19
Should the priorities be
  • employability?
  • What employers want (/need)?
  • competency?
  • and - academic standards?
  • and - what the subject dictates?
  • and - intellectual ability?

And where does money, fte ratios, staff time,
facilities, student destinations etc come into
this?
20
John Henry Newman, Oriel College, Oxford. 1826 -
1842
  • The Idea of a University
  • The University is a temple for the teaching of
    universal knowledge. (specialist knowledge should
    be taught in an institution)
  • The only goal of a university should be the
    cultivation of the intellect
  • A university produces gentlemen trained in logic
    and the methods of assessing evidence (the
    classics)
  • Is run by tutors who regard their office as a
    calling

21
So can we say that
  • A competency driven model is always at odds with
    an academically based model?
  • Academic integrity always takes second place to
    professional body requirements?
  • Academics should be true to themselves?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com