Title: Assimilation of satellite data at ECMWF Prospects for use of radiooccultation measurements JeanNol T
1Assimilation of satellite data at ECMWF
Prospects for use of radio-occultation
measurementsJean-Noël ThépautECMWFthanks to
Tony McNally, Graeme Kelly, Antje Dethof and
Niels Bormann
2Outline
- Importance of current satellite observations at
ECMWF and performances of the NWP system - Needs for and challenges with high vertical
resolution soundings - AIRS
- MIPAS
- Priorities for the future Scope for using GPS
radio-occultation measurements - CAL/VAL and monitoring capabilities
- Acquisition of limb sounding expertise
- Solve the vertical resolution requirements?
3Importance of current satellite observations in
the ECMWF system
- Satellite data have progressively become an
essential part of the observing system used at
ECMWF - Satellite data represent by far the largest
volume of data (and associated computing cost)
used in the ECMWF data assimilation system - Satellite data have recently caught up
radiosondes in terms of forecast skill impact
over NH - 4D-Var is particularly appropriate to assimilate
high time frequency data -
44D-Variational Analysis of Observations (4D-Var)
5Satellite data actively used in the current ECMWF
DA system
6NOAA15-16-17 and DMSP13-14-15 satellitesAMSU/HIRS
SSM/I raw radiances
7NASA-Quikscat (Seawinds)
8Geostationary platforms AMVsWV radiances
9Polar platforms AMVs from MODIS-TERRA
10GOME and SBUV-NOAA16 ozone profiles/columns
11Current data count (31/01/2003 00Z)
Data entering the screening
Data assimilated
- Synop 166207 (1.1)
- Aircraft 251024 (1.7)
- Satob/modis 618434 (4.2)
- Dribu 7480 (0.005)
- Temp 108520 (0.7)
- Pilot 78006 (0.5)
- Upper Sat 13151980 (90)
- PAOB 538 (0.00)
- Scat 225330 (1.6)
- TOTAL 14607519 (95.8)
- Synop 37065 (2.5)
- Aircraft 157817 (10.8)
- Satob 83532 (5.7)
- Dribu 3669 (0.25)
- Temp 60887 (4.2)
- Pilot 44498 (3.0)
- Upper Sat 960561 (65.6)
- PAOB 182 (0.01)
- Scat 115692 (7.9)
- TOTAL 1463903 (79.2)
12Evolution of forecast skill for the northern and
southern hemispheres
13Latest Observing System Experiments
NH
120 days 500 hPa Z scores
SH
14Partial conclusions
- Our current data assimilation system is heavily
constrained by nearly 2 millions of observations
(mostly satellite data) every 12 hours - (500 radiosondes a day have ½ the impact of
satellite data in the Northern Hemisphere) - We have to be realistic in terms of expectation
from new Observing Systems - the metric for evaluation may be more related to
fixing a number of forecast busts than improving
scores on average - Our current requirements concern high vertical
resolution (in all weather including below
clouds) for temperature/humidity/wind
15What will future satellite systems offer?
- Advanced IR sounders will improve vertical
resolutions (but still not resolve the humidity
of boundary layer top and the tropopause) - further limitations due to vertical structure
functions in the NWP model - further limitations due to the presence of
clouds - Limb data (passive and active/GPS) will provide
very high vertical resolution - but difficult assimilation problem in the
horizontal (ray tracing) - problem of accuracy in the BL
- It is hoped that Global NWP assimilation system
is perfectly placed to exploit the synergy
between the two
16AIRS/IASI Progress towards an assimilation
strategy at ECMWF
- By measuring radiation in thousands of different
spectral channels, the Atmospheric InfraRed
Sounder AIRS can provide temperature and humidity
information at a much higher vertical resolution
than that from current sounders - To fully exploit the potential of AIRS, several
issues have to be tackled - Handle the data volume from advanced sounders
efficiently - Technically absorb a substantial increase of
data count in the system - Scientifically extract the maximum information
content from the full spectrum - Design an efficient cloud detection scheme
- clouds can severely limit the information from
advanced infrared sounders (probably in the most
crucial areas) - Design an effective monitoring system able to
cope with multichannel information - Learning exercise for IASI/CRIS
17HIRS channel weighting functions
AIRS channel weighting functions (1/10th of
channels)
18Future instruments ADVANCED IR NADIR SOUNDERS
AIRS averaging
HIRS averaging
19Cloud cover and sensitivity
Average model low cloud cover in June 2000
(contour 50/75))
Monthly mean keyanalysis errors in June 2000
20The robustness of the current system makes it
hard to demonstrate quickly a spectacular impact
of a new satellite instrument
Day-3
RMS of 500hPa geopotential forecast error
averaged over 40 days (Dec 02/ Jan 03) AIRS
error minus CTRL error
Day-5
The assimilation of AIRS radiances shows a small
but consistent positive impact on forecast
quality in all areas
Day-7
21ENVISAT (ESA)
- ECMWF supports the ENVISAT CAL/VAL.
- ENVISAT will enhance our capabilities to monitor
and assimilate ozone - ECMWF will study the feasibility of assimilation
of MIPAS limb sounding radiances
22ASSET AT ECMWF Assimilation of MIPAS IR limb
radiances
- Idea
- Use radiances as observations, rather than
retrieved profiles of temperature, humidity,
ozone, - Why?
- Very successful at ECMWF for nadir sounders
flexibility - Estimation of observation error and bias
characteristics easier for radiances than for
retrievals - Avoids having to account for the use of a priori
information in the retrievals - Some challenges
- Limb geometry, ray-tracing
- Channel/data selection out of about 60,000
points per sweep - Fast radiative transfer model
- Error characteristics (background observations)
23Priorities for the future Scope for using GPS
radio-occultation measurements
- Impact of the background error covariance to
propagate information from observations in the
vertical (how to best formulate B and how to make
it evolve while high vertical resolution data
become available)? - Is there a standard accurate enough to allow the
detection and correction of radiance biases? - Can radio-occultation measurements help for the
calibration? - do we need active sensors?
- How best develop expertise in limb sounding?
- Progressive approach
24ECMWF could offer monitoring and cal/val
capabilities for this new type of observations
- Passive assimilation Data are not assimilated
actively, but go through the assimilation system
and statistics (e.g. first-guess departures) are
calculated (offers Near Real Time quality
control). Not too complicated observation
operator required! - Use assimilation system to evaluate data
quality, biases, instrument and algorithm
stability (can also show model problems) - Output statistics
- - Number of data
- - Mean
- - Stdev of
- - time series
25 Example of ECMWF / SAF external web
operational (NRT) satellite data monitoring
26 New ECMWF / SAF external web (time series
for limited area statistics)
Disturbance to global statistics caused by
sudden warming over North Pole
Large disturbance in global statistics for
stratospheric AMSUA channels
No disturbance seen in statistics for Tropics
or Southern Hemisphere
27ECMWF plans for the assimilation of GPS
radio-occultation measurements (1)
- New field in data assimilation at ECMWF
- all weather, high vertical resolution and
self calibration capabilities are attractive
features for global NWP - We would love to verify this !!
- But importance of the characterisation of the
errors to fully exploit these data - 4DVAR offers the best dynamically consistent
ancillary data to perform the RO inversion
28ECMWF plans for the assimilation of GPS
radio-occultation measurements (2)
- Investment worth the effort because
- GPSGALILEO will increase the number of possible
occultations - Research and Operational missions are up or
underway - CHAMP (Germany, NASA,),COSMIC (NASA,NOAA,UCAR,NSF
,JPL,Taiwan,), ACE (ESA GPS/GALILEO-LEO
LEO-LEO), GRAS (EUMETSAT) - A stepwise approach is possible
- Assimilation of temperature/humidity profiles
(unlikely!) - Assimilation of refractivity profiles
- Assimilation of bending angles (is it necessary?)
29ECMWF/EUMETSAT fellowship on RO assimilation
- 3-year (12) EUMETSAT funded fellowship
- Will start 1st September 2003
- Several-fold objective
- Develop in-house expertise with limb geometry
(observation operator) - Exploit the RO data for model (bias) validation
- CAL/VAL the METOP-GRAS instrument
- Get involved in the GRAS-SAF products validation
- Investigate the feasibility of level-1ish RO
assimilation - Prepare for future missions (COSMIC, ACE,)