Drug Testing in Selection: Legal, Ethical and Privacy Issues - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Drug Testing in Selection: Legal, Ethical and Privacy Issues

Description:

... be effective in reducing drug use, work accidents or work performance problems ... Toronto Dominion Bank (1994) Blanket drug testing of all new employees ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:999
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: Brant4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Drug Testing in Selection: Legal, Ethical and Privacy Issues


1
Drug Testing in SelectionLegal, Ethical and
Privacy Issues
  • Kendra Beard
  • Makenzie Donaldson

2
What is Drug Testing?
  • Definition
  • Term to describe the number of methods used to
    determine if an individual is currently using
    drugs or if an individual has used such
    substances in the recent past
  • Drug tests can detect the use of alcohol,
    prescription and over-the-counter medications as
    well as illicit drugs

3
Drug Testing in Screening Process
  • Purpose
  • To screen out bad apples
  • Justification
  • Safety
  • Absenteeism and lateness
  • Sick leave
  • Productivity
  • Employer Liability

4
Difference Between Alcohol and Drug Testing
  • Alcohol testing
  • Results show level of impairment
  • Measure current usage
  • Drug testing
  • Questionable reliability and validity
  • Invasive tests - bodily fluids are needed
  • Available tests do NOT measure the level or time
    of impairment
  • Positive tests do not establish the existence of
    dependency

5
Studies Show
  • Among drug users up to 50
  • More absenteeism
  • Greater use of sick leave benefits
  • Drug users have productivity levels 10 - 60
    lower than non-users
  • Dangerous working conditions, noise and dirt,
    conflicts at work and sleep problems are more
    strongly related to workplace accidents

6
Arguments Against
  • Inability to demonstrate impairment
  • No relation to on-the-job performance
  • Test errors and false positives/negatives
  • Freedom of choice
  • Privacy
  • Confidentiality of results
  • Workplace morale
  • Drug testing programs have not shown to be
    effective in reducing drug use, work accidents or
    work performance problems

7
History U.S. Influence
  • Emerged in the mid-80s largely in response to
    issues occurring in the US
  • ex. Transport accidents with drugs found on crew
  • 1986 Reagan order requiring all Fed agencies to
    establish standards and procedures to ensure drug
    free workplace
  • 1988 Employers doing business w/ govt in
    excess of 25,000 must also certify a drug free
    environment

8
History U.S. Influence (cont)
  • U.S. influences regulation in other countries
  • Pressure to do business with U.S.
  • Cross-border trucking and busing
  • 1997 Cdn trucking companies must comply w/ U.S.
    regulation to operate in U.S.

9
Background in Canada
  • Past cases
  • Entrop vs. Imperial Oil (1992)
  • Entrop admitted to past drinking problem
  • Sober since 1984, but demoted w/ same pay
  • Rigorous reinstatement procedure
  • Toronto Dominion Bank (1994)
  • Blanket drug testing of all new employees
  • Those testing positive were still hired, but must
    go through a confidential rehabilitation program
    at the banks expense

10
Canadian Human Rights Act
  • Updated July 10, 2002 following Entrop vs.
    Imperial Oil
  • The CHRA prohibits discrimination on the grounds
    of disability or perceived disability
  • Drug and alcohol dependency are considered
    disabilities under the Act

11
Canadian Human Rights Act (cont)
  • Outlines different applications of testing
  • Pre-Employment testing
  • Random testing
  • Reasonable Cause and Post-Incident testing
  • Fitness-for-Duty testing
  • Mandatory Disclosure
  • Follow-Up testing

12
Canadian Human Rights Act (cont)
  • Pre-Employment testing
  • Since a positive pre-employment drug test will in
    no way predict whether the individual will be
    impaired at any time while on the job,
    pre-employment testing cannot be shown to be
    reasonably necessary to accomplish the legitimate
    goal of hiring non-impaired workers

13
Employer Responsibility
  • Must prove a Bona Fide Occupational Requirement
    in order to perform testing
  • Accommodation to the point of undue hardship
  • Counseling and rehabilitation
  • We should help them, not punish them
  • Ex. Trucker reassigned to Canada-only routes

14
Alternatives
  • Shortcomings of drug testing can be avoided by
    performance tests that measure actual
    concentration and reaction time instead of
    chemical residues
  • Computer video game tests that detect impairment
    due to drugs, fatigue, stress, or illness are now
    available on the market
  • Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs)
  • Increased supervision and observation
  • Positive peer reporting systems

15
Conclusion
  • Question time
  • THANKS!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com