Depressive symptoms and the onset of menarche - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 46
About This Presentation
Title:

Depressive symptoms and the onset of menarche

Description:

and the onset of menarche. What is ALSPAC? 'Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children' ... Age at onset of menarche. Assessed repeatedly by questionnaire ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:126
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 47
Provided by: jonh5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Depressive symptoms and the onset of menarche


1
Depressive symptoms and the onset of menarche
2
What is ALSPAC?
  • Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children
  • AKA Children of the Nineties
  • Cohort study of 14,000 children and their
    parents, based in south-west England
  • Eligibility criteria Mothers had to be resident
    in Avon and have an expected date of delivery
    between April 1st 1991 and December 31st 1992
  • Population based prospective cohort study

3
Wheres Avon to?
4
What data does ALSPAC have?
  • Self completion questionnaires
  • Mothers, Partners, Children, Teachers
  • Hands on assessments
  • 10 sample tested regularly since birth
  • Yearly clinics for all since age 7
  • Data from external sources
  • SATS from LEA, Child Health database
  • Biological samples
  • DNA / cell lines

5
Data for current models - outcome
  • Depressive symptoms
  • Short form of Mood and Feelings Questionnaire
  • Angold, A., Costello, E. J., Messer, S. C.,
    Pickles, A., Winder, F., Silver, D. (1995).
    Development of a short questionnaire for use in
    epidemiological studies of depression in children
    and adolescents. International Journal of Methods
    in Psychiatric Research, 5, 237249.
  • Costello, E. J., Angold, A. (1988). Scales to
    assess child and adolescent depression
    Checklists, screens and nets. Journal of the
    American Academy of Child and Adolescent
    Psychiatry, 27, 726737.
  • Assessed in clinic self report
  • 3 time points 10y7m, 12y10m, 13y10m

6
Depressive symptoms Short MFQ
  • I felt miserable or unhappy
    (True/Sometimes/Not at all)
  • I didn't enjoy anything at all
  • I felt so tired I just sat around and did nothing
  • I was very restless
  • I felt I was no good any more
  • I cried a lot
  • I found it hard to think properly or concentrate
  • I hated myself
  • I was a bad person
  • I felt lonely
  • I thought nobody really loved me
  • I thought I could never been as good as other
    kids
  • I did everything wrong

7
Depressive symptoms Short MFQ
  • I felt miserable or unhappy
    (True/Sometimes/Not at all)
  • I didn't enjoy anything at all
  • I felt so tired I just sat around and did nothing
  • I was very restless
  • I felt I was no good any more
  • I cried a lot
  • I found it hard to think properly or concentrate
  • I hated myself
  • I was a bad person
  • I felt lonely
  • I thought nobody really loved me
  • I thought I could never been as good as other
    kids
  • I did everything wrong

8
Restless non-response more common
9
Restless non-monotonic change
10
Subscales odd / even
  • Measured using short MFQ (13 items)
  • I felt miserable or unhappy
  • I didn't enjoy anything at all
  • I felt so tired I just sat around and did nothing
  • I was very restless
  • I felt I was no good any more
  • I cried a lot
  • I found it hard to think properly or concentrate
  • I hated myself
  • I was a bad person
  • I felt lonely
  • I thought nobody really loved me
  • I thought I could never been as good as other
    kids
  • I did everything wrong

11
Depression scales basic stats
12
Depression scales basic stats
13
Data for current models - exposure
  • Age at onset of menarche
  • Assessed repeatedly by questionnaire
  • Respondent mother and/or daughter
  • 3 groups
  • Before 11½ (14.7)
  • 11½ - 13½ (65.5)
  • After 13½ (19.8)

14
Study sample
  • 2063 with complete data
  • All are girls (obviously!)
  • Intention is to repeat models with boys using
    alternative measures of pubertal onset

15
1 Simple cross-sectional models
16
1 Standardized results
  • --------------------------------------------------
    --------------
  • Coef. SE t Pgtt
    95 CI
  • -------------------------------------------------
    --------------
  • t1 (10y7m)
  • Early menarche .042 .064 0.67 0.505
    -.082 .167
  • Late menarche .027 .057 0.47 0.637
    -.084 .137
  • --------------------------------------------------
    --------------
  • --------------------------------------------------
    --------------
  • t2 (12y10m)
  • Early menarche .220 .063 3.48 0.001
    .096 .344
  • Late menarche .005 .056 0.08 0.936
    -.106 .115
  • --------------------------------------------------
    --------------
  • --------------------------------------------------
    --------------
  • t3 (13y10m)
  • Early menarche .191 .063 3.02 0.003
    .067 .315
  • Late menarche -.170 .056 -3.03 0.002
    -.281 -.060
  • --------------------------------------------------
    --------------

17
However
  • Scales are skewed
  • Data is longitudinal
  • Heterogeneity in patterns of change
  • Scale properties may not be invariant across time

18
2 Measurement Invariance model
19
2 Measurement Invariance model - on items
Optional
Item-1
Item-12
Item-1
Item-12
Item-1
Item-12



F_t1
F_t2
F_t3
Menarche onset
20
2 Measurement Invariance model
Decent fit for fully invariant model
  • CFI
    0.952
  • TLI
    0.975
  • Number of Free Parameters
    57
  • RMSEA (Root Mean Square Error Of Approximation)
    0.043
  • WRMR (Weighted Root Mean Square Residual)
    1.892

21
2 Measurement Invariance results
  • Meas Inv model
  • Estimate (SE), P-Value
    Estimate (SE), P-Value
  • F_t1 ON
  • EARLYMEN 0.044 (0.071), p 0.534 0.042
    (0.064), p 0.505
  • LATEMEN 0.025 (0.064), p 0.700 0.027
    (0.057), p 0.637
  • F_t2 ON
  • EARLYMEN 0.239 (0.073), p 0.001 0.220
    (0.063), p 0.001
  • LATEMEN 0.004 (0.065), p 0.956 0.005
    (0.056), p 0.936
  • F_t3 ON
  • EARLYMEN 0.206 (0.073), p 0.005 0.191
    (0.063), p 0.003
  • LATEMEN -0.198 (0.065), p 0.002 -0.170
    (0.056), p 0.002

22
c.f. with equivalent simple C/S results
  • Meas Inv model
    Simple C/S
  • Estimate (SE), P-Value
    Estimate (SE), P-Value
  • t1/F_t1 ON
  • EARLYMEN 0.044 (0.071), p 0.534 0.042
    (0.064), p 0.505
  • LATEMEN 0.025 (0.064), p 0.700 0.027
    (0.057), p 0.637
  • t2/F_t2 ON
  • EARLYMEN 0.239 (0.073), p 0.001 0.220
    (0.063), p 0.001
  • LATEMEN 0.004 (0.065), p 0.956 0.005
    (0.056), p 0.936
  • t3/F_t3 ON
  • EARLYMEN 0.206 (0.073), p 0.005 0.191
    (0.063), p 0.003
  • LATEMEN -0.198 (0.065), p 0.002 -0.170
    (0.056), p 0.002

23
1 C/S 2 Meas Invariant
24
Considerable variability between subjects
25
3 2nd Order Growth Model
26
3 2nd Order Growth Model piecewise
Optional
t1_odd
t1_even
t2_odd
t2_even
t3_odd
t3_even
F_t1
F_t2
F_t3
F_i
F_s1
27
3 2nd Order Growth Model piecewise
t1_odd
t1_even
t2_odd
t2_even
t3_odd
t3_even
F_t1
F_t2
F_t3
Zero residual variance
F_i
F_s1
28
3 Growth model fit
  • CFI
    0.972
  • TLI
    0.970
  • Number of Free Parameters
    13
  • Akaike (AIC)
    46763.214
  • Bayesian (BIC)
    46836.429
  • Sample-Size Adjusted BIC
    46795.126
  • RMSEA (Root Mean Square Error Of Approximation)
  • Estimate
    0.077
  • 90 Percent C.I.
    0.068 0.088
  • Probability RMSEA lt .05
    0.000
  • SRMR (Standardized Root Mean Square Residual)
  • Value 0.037

29
3 Growth model parameters

  • Two-Tailed
  • Estimate S.E.
    Est./S.E. P-Value
  • Means
  • INTCPT 2.370 0.045
    52.119 0.000
  • SLOPE1 0.112 0.021
    5.435 0.000
  • SLOPE2 0.686 0.050
    13.660 0.000
  • Variances
  • INTCPT 3.382 0.144
    23.462 0.000
  • SLOPE1 0.653 0.029
    22.313 0.000
  • SLOPE2 4.053 0.170
    23.864 0.000
  • INTCPT WITH
  • SLOPE1 0.985 0.052
    19.072 0.000
  • SLOPE2 -0.946 0.105
    -9.003 0.000
  • SLOPE1 WITH
  • SLOPE2 -0.324 0.049
    -6.678 0.000

30
3 Growth model - add menarche
  • INTCPT ON
  • EARLYMEN 0.061 (0.071), p 0.386
  • LATEMEN 0.037 (0.063), p 0.559
  • INTCPT ON
  • EARLYMEN 0.237 (0.068), p 0.001
  • LATEMEN -0.003 (0.061), p 0.959
  • INTCPT ON
  • EARLYMEN 0.210 (0.066), p 0.002
  • LATEMEN -0.185 (0.059), p 0.002
  • SLOPE1 ON
  • EARLYMEN 0.189 (0.073), p 0.010
  • LATEMEN -0.033 (0.065), p 0.606
  • SLOPE2 ON
  • EARLYMEN 0.029 (0.071), p 0.683
  • LATEMEN -0.214 (0.063), p 0.001

31
3 Growth model - add menarche
  • INTCPT ON
  • EARLYMEN 0.061 (0.071), p 0.386
  • LATEMEN 0.037 (0.063), p 0.559
  • INTCPT ON
  • EARLYMEN 0.237 (0.068), p 0.001
  • LATEMEN -0.003 (0.061), p 0.959
  • INTCPT ON
  • EARLYMEN 0.210 (0.066), p 0.002
  • LATEMEN -0.185 (0.059), p 0.002
  • SLOPE1 ON
  • EARLYMEN 0.189 (0.073), p 0.010
  • LATEMEN -0.033 (0.065), p 0.606
  • SLOPE2 ON
  • EARLYMEN 0.029 (0.071), p 0.683
  • LATEMEN -0.214 (0.063), p 0.001

32
Compare models so far
33
Measurement Invariance model - alternative
Item-1
Item-12
Item-1
Item-12
Item-1
Item-12



F_t1
F_t2
F_t3
Menarche onset
34
Compare models so far
35
Compare models so far
36
Effect of censoring on 1st order factors
Uncensored
Censored
t1
??
t2
??
t3
??
37
4 Growth model with mixture
38
4 Growth model with mixture
  • overall
  • lt. . .gt
  • c1 on earlymen latemen
  • c1
  • slope1
  • slope1
  • slope2
  • slope2
  • intcpt
  • intcpt
  • intcpt on earlymen latemen
  • slope1 slope2 on earlymen latemen
  • intcpt with slope1 slope2
  • slope1 with slope2

c2 slope1_at_0 slope1_at_0 slope2_at_0
slope2_at_0 intcpt intcpt intcpt on
earlymen latemen intcpt with slope1_at_0
slope2_at_0 slope1 with slope2_at_0
39
4 Growth model with mixture
  • overall
  • lt. . .gt
  • c1 on earlymen latemen
  • c1
  • slope1
  • slope1
  • slope2
  • slope2
  • intcpt
  • intcpt
  • intcpt on earlymen latemen
  • slope1 slope2 on earlymen latemen
  • intcpt with slope1 slope2
  • slope1 with slope2

c2 slope1_at_0 slope1_at_0 slope2_at_0
slope2_at_0 intcpt intcpt intcpt on
earlymen latemen intcpt with slope1_at_0
slope2_at_0 slope1 with slope2_at_0
No change in symptoms
Change is permitted
40
4 Two class results
  • LATENT CLASSES BASED ON THE ESTIMATED MODEL
  • c1 1074.91 52.1
  • c2 988.09 47.9
  • BASED ON MODAL CLASS
  • c1 1033 50.1
  • c2 1030 49.9

Average Latent Class Probabilities for Modal
Class (Row) by Latent Class (Column)
1 2 1 0.958 0.042 2 0.083
0.917 Entropy 0.774
41
4 Two class results
42
4 Two class results
C1 ON EARLYMEN 1.363 1.016, 1.828, p
0.039 LATEMEN 0.863 0.619, 1.112, p
0.254
  • Class 1
  • INTCPT ON
  • EARLYMEN -0.002 (0.092), p0.980
  • LATEMEN 0.130 (0.091), p0.154
  • SLOPE1 ON
  • EARLYMEN 0.159 (0.095), p0.094
  • LATEMEN -0.061 (0.081), p0.448
  • SLOPE2 ON
  • EARLYMEN 0.003 (0.096), p0.972
  • LATEMEN -0.213 (0.075), p0.004

Class 2 INTCPT ON EARLYMEN 0.136 (0.160),
p0.396 LATEMEN -0.105 (0.119), p0.377
43
Has that really helped with the skewness?
Manifest measures within class
44
Has that really helped with the skewness?
1st level factors within class
45
What next?
  • Semi-continuous models
  • Zero-inflated models
  • ideal for instance where a score of zero is
    substantively different to score of 1
  • Split measures in binary (zero/non-zero) and cts
    (e.g. log of non-zero scores)
  • Prevalence of non-zero is 60-70 so what does
    such an onset mean
  • Limited scope for modelling of 3 binaries, i.e.
  • i bin_fd_at_0 bin_ff_at_2.25 bin_fg_at_3.25

46
Summary / conclusions
  • We have 3 skewed measures of MFQ and wish to
    assess the extend to which early menarche leads
    to an earlier and/or greater onset in depressive
    symptoms
  • The models considered thus far are in good
    agreement and have not altered the conclusions
    made on the initial figure
  • Inclined to favour the invariance model based on
    items only model which appears to have
    successful dealt with skewness
  • Thoughts gratefully received
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com