Looking Back: Reflections on Banff 1991 From Banff 2003 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Looking Back: Reflections on Banff 1991 From Banff 2003

Description:

International involvement Canada (2), USA (3), Denmark, Finland ... in high quality international journal (Kidney International 44: 411-422,1993) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:66
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: kims2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Looking Back: Reflections on Banff 1991 From Banff 2003


1
Looking Back Reflections on Banff 1991 From
Banff 2003
  • Douglas R. Wilson, M.D.

2
Statement in 1991 Why Banff? Searching for the
muse!
  • The Muses were nine goddesses of the arts and
    sciences in Greek mythology.
  • The Muses lived on Mount Olympus with their
    leader, the god Apollo. Like him the Muses
    remained young and beautiful forever.
  • They could see into the future, which few other
    gods could do. They also had the ability to
    banish all grief and sorrow. The muses had
    pleasing melodic voices and often sang as a
    chorus.
  • Early Greek writers and
    artists called on the muses
    for inspiration before
    beginning to work.

3
The Nine Muses
  • Any or all of the muses could be asked for
    assistance even though each governed a specific
    art or science
  • Calliope Muse of epic poetry
  • Erato Muse of love poetry
  • Euterpe Muse of lyric poetry
  • Melpomene Muse of tragedy
  • Thalia Muse of comedy
  • Clio Muse of history
  • Urania Muse of astronomy
  • Polyhymnia Muse of sacred song
  • Terpsichore Muse of dance

4
We call on CLIO The MUSE of HISTORYAndTHALIA
The MUSE of COMEDYOut of DisasterandFrom the
Heartcame BANFF !!
5
  • 1989 - International Society of Nephrology
    launched the ISN Commission on Acute Renal
    Failure, chaired by Kim Solez, with a focus on
    disaster relief, in response to the disorganized
    international approach to the earthquake in
    Armenia
  • 1990 Published work on standardization of
    nomenclature for the diagnosis of heart and lung
    transplant rejection.

6
  • 1991 - August 2-4 First Banff meeting organized
    by ISN Commission to include a meeting of the
    Disaster Relief Task Forceand
  • Workshop on International Standardization of the
    Nomenclature and Criteria for the Histologic
    Diagnosis of Kidney Transplant Rejection
  • Its no wonder that it came to be called the
    Banff schema !!

7
Notable Features of first Banff meeting included
  • Good advance work (Croker,Olsen, Racusen, Solez)
  • Small size - about 20 participants
  • Mix of pathologists and transplant clinicians
    (7-8 of each, and largely in teams from the same
    center)
  • International involvement Canada (2), USA (3),
    Denmark, Finland
  • Fine arts accompaniment recitals and Cosi fan
    Tutte - the Muses of Poetry, Dance and Song

8

The way we were! Movies from 1991 courtesy of
Phil and Ginny Halloran!
9
Video Clip from Banff 1991
10
LOTS OF FOLLOW-UP WORK by phone, fax, meetings
and correspondence to
  • greatly widen the circle of those involved
  • circulate sets of slides for panel assessment
  • publication of Banff schema in high quality
    international journal (Kidney International 44
    411-422,1993)
  • with inclusive authorship USA (10 centers),
    Canada (3), UK (1), Denmark (1), Finland (1),
    Switzerland (1), and Japan (2)

11
Maintain Momentum A work-in-progress for 12
years
  • Bi-Annual meetings
  • 1993, 1995, 1997, 1999, 2001 at
  • Banff Springs Hotel and Rimrock Resort
  • Active involvement of liver transplant
    pathologists and clinicians
  • Widespread use of the classification in world
    wide sites and in clinical trials of
    immunosuppressive regimens

12
  • Ability to achieve agreement on changes based on
    other schema 1997 Collaborative Clinical
    Trials in Transplantation (CCTT)
  • Regular, significant, and inclusive publications
  • Kidney International 55 713-723,1999
  • (27 centers) and
  • Am. J Transplantation 31-7,2003
  • (24 centres)

13
Much has been accomplished, Much has been
learned
  • orWhat does it take to get 41 pathologists and
    clinicians to collaborate ??over a long time !
  • Lessons Learned 6 Success Factors
  • Common cause that has obvious importance and
    practical value-added
  • A loose tight organization inclusive,
    flexible, but goal-driven. Function is more
    important than structure!

14
  • Collaboration of pathologists and clinicians is
    critical (or.. It is easier for pathologists to
    agree if there are simple clinicians involved
    with them
  • Committed champions willing to push the process
    of collaboration over extended time period
  • Willingness of all to share the credit
  • Pleasure and satisfaction of working and having
    fun with international colleagues

15
Here is a Toast to the melodic voices of the
chorus of Muses !!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com