Enthalpy vs. Composition - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Enthalpy vs. Composition

Description:

We will also need to employ energy balances, based on enthalpy, for certain separation problems. ... Note that the enthalpy- composition plot is presented in ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:540
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: Shan242
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Enthalpy vs. Composition


1
Enthalpy vs. Composition Ponchon-Savarit
Plot
  • We have begun to employ mass balances, both total
    and component.
  • We will also need to employ energy balances,
    based on enthalpy, for certain separation
    problems.
  • We can use the Enthalpy vs. composition plot to
    obtain this information.

2
Enthalpy vs. Composition Ponchon-Savarit Plot
3
Enthalpy vs. Composition Ponchon-Savarit
Plot
  • 3 phases are shown on the plot solid, liquid,
    and vapor.
  • Temperature is represented by isothermal tie
    lines between the saturated liquid (boiling) line
    and the saturated vapor (dew) line.
  • Points between the saturated liquid line and the
    saturated vapor line represent a two-phase,
    liquid-vapor system.
  • An azeotrope is indicated by the composition at
    which the isotherm becomes vertical. Why?
  • Why are the boiling point temperatures of the
    pure components different than those determined
    from the y vs. x and T vs. x,y plots for
    ethanol-water?
  • The azeotrope for ethanol-water is indicated as T
    77.65 oC and a concentration of 0.955. Why is
    this different than that determined from the y
    vs. x and T vs. x,y plots for ethanol-water?

4
Enthalpy vs. Composition Ponchon-Savarit
Plot
  • Note the boiling temperatures of the pure
    components, water and ethanol, and the
    temperature of the azeotrope are different due to
    the pressure at which the data was taken
  • P 1 kg/cm2 (0.97 atm) 1 atm
  • Water 99.1 oC 100 oC
  • Ethanol 77.8 78.30
  • Azeotrope 77.65 78.15

5
Mole Fraction vs. Weight Fraction
  • Note that the enthalpy- composition plot is
    presented in terms of weight fractions we will
    typically use mole fractions so one must convert
    between the two.
  • For ethanol-water, this can be readily done using
    the molecular weights, MWEtOH 46.07 and MWw
    18.02.

6
Azetrope Composition Mole Fraction
vs. Weight Fraction
  • Converting from wt fraction of the azeotrope to
    mole fraction
  • Thus, the azeotropic mole fraction is greater at
    P 1 Kg/cm2 than at 1 atm 0.902 vs. 0.8943.
  • Although slight, one can begin to see the effect
    of pressure on the azeotropic point.

7
Converting Weight Fraction to Mole Fraction In
General
  • For a binary mixture
  • For a mixture of C components

8
Enthalpy vs. Composition Ponchon-Savarit
Plot
  • The bubble point temperature and dew point
    temperatures can be determined from the enthalpy
    vs. composition plot.
  • The compositions of the 1st bubble formed and the
    last liquid drop can be determined from the
    enthalpy vs. composition plot.
  • An auxiliary line is used to assist in these
    determinations

9
Enthalpy vs. Composition Bubble Point
Temperature
10
Enthalpy vs. Composition 1st Bubble
Composition
11
Enthalpy vs. Composition Dew Point
Temperature
12
Enthalpy vs. Composition Last Liquid Drop
Composition
13
Enthalpy vs. Composition Enthalpy
Determination
  • The major purpose of an enthalpy diagram is to
    determine enthalpies.
  • We will use enthalpies in energy balances later.
  • For example, if one were given a feed mixture of
    35 ethanol (weight ) at T 92oC and P 1
    kg/cm2 and the mixture was allowed to separate
    into vapor and liquid, what would be the
    enthalpies of the feed, vapor, and liquid?

14
Enthalpy vs. Composition Enthalpy
Determination
15
Equilibrium Data How to Handle?
  • Tabular Data
  • Generate graphical plots
  • Generate analytical expressions (curve fit)
  • Graphical
  • y vs. x (P constant) McCabe-Theile Pot
  • T vs. x,y (P constant) Saturated Liquid, Vapor
    Plot
  • Enthalpy vs. composition (P constant, T)
    Ponchon-Savarit Plot
  • Analytical expressions
  • Thermodynamics Equations of state/Gibbs free
    energy models
  • Distribution coefficients, K values
  • Relative volatility
  • DePreister charts
  • Curve fit of data

16
Analytical Expressions for Equilibrium
  • To date, we have looked at various ways to
    represent equilibrium behavior of binary systems
    graphically.
  • There are several disadvantages to using
    graphical techniques
  • One cannot readily plot multi-component systems
    graphically (maximum is typically three).
  • Separator design often has to be done using
    numerical methods thus, analytical expressions
    for equilibrium behavior are needed.
  • We will now look at other representations for
    handling equilibrium data analytically

17
Other Equilibrium Relationships
Distribution Coefficient
18
Other Equilibrium Relationships DePriester
Charts
  • One convenient source of K values for
    hydrocarbons, as a function of temperature and
    pressure (watch units), are the DePriester charts
    (Figs. 2-11 and 2-12, pp. 24-25, Wankat).
  • The DePriester plots are presented over two
    different temperature ranges.

19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
Using DePriester Charts Boiling Temperatures
of Pure Components
  • One can determine the boiling point for a given
    component and pressure directly from the
    DePriester Charts one can then determine which
    component in a mixture is the more volatile the
    lower the boiling point, the more volatile a
    component is.
  • For a pure component, K 1.0.
  • Assume one wishes to determine the boiling point
    temperature of ethylene at a pressure of P 3000
    kPa

22
Tbp - 9.5 oC
23
Question DePriester Charts
  • What are the equilibrium distribution
    coefficients, K, for a mixture containing
  • Ethylene
  • n-Pentane
  • n-Heptane
  • at T 120 oC and P 1500 kPa?

24
(No Transcript)
25
Answer DePriester Charts
  • The equilibrium distribution coefficients, K,
    are
  • K
  • Ethylene 8.5
  • n-Pentane 0.64
  • n-Heptane 0.17
  • at T 120 oC and P 1500 kPa.

26
Question Volatility
  • What can one say about the volatility of each
    component from the K values?
  • K
  • Ethylene 8.5
  • n-Pentane 0.64
  • n-Heptane 0.17

27
Answer Volatility
  • What can one say about the volatility of each
    component from the K values?
  • K T boiling
  • Ethylene 8.5 -35.5 oC
  • n-Pentane 0.64 153 oC
  • n-Heptane 0.17 gt200 oC
  • The boiling point temperatures of the pure
    components at P 1500 kPa have also been
    determined from the DePriester charts for K 1.0
    for each component (n-heptanes is off the
    chart).
  • From the K values and the boiling point
    temperature of each pure component, one can say
    that the volatility follows the trend that
    ethylenegtn-pentanegtn-heptane.

28
Other Equilibrium Relationships DePriester
Equation
29
Other Equilibrium Relationships Mole Fraction
Vapor Pressure Relationship
30
Other Equilibrium Relationships Distribution
Coefficient Vapor Pressure Relationship
31
Other Equilibrium Relationships Relative
Volatility
32
Other Equilibrium Relationships Relative
Volatility
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com